課程資訊
課程名稱
國際法專題
Seminar on Problems of International Law 
開課學期
102-2 
授課對象
社會科學院  政治學研究所  
授課教師
蔡季廷 
課號
PS7023 
課程識別碼
322 M4050 
班次
 
學分
全/半年
半年 
必/選修
必修 
上課時間
星期一3,4(10:20~12:10) 
上課地點
社科研2 
備註
碩班必修:國際關係。
限碩士班以上
總人數上限:20人
外系人數限制:3人 
Ceiba 課程網頁
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1022PS7023_ 
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述

This is an advanced research seminar on public international law. In the past two centuries, though legal positivism (thus lawyers and conventional legal scholars) dominate the development of international law, both students of new legal realism and political science has begun to rediscover various “political” functions of international law in the past decade. Just to name a few, why and how international law influences states and individual behaviors regardless of lacking of coercive mechanism; why and how conventional functions of sovereignty transforms in the post-World War II era; how to understand the international law in action as opposed to international law in theory. Such “political” revival of the research of international law conducted by both international legal and political science scholars suggests a new demand for international law: a coherent international law research methodology from social science perspectives both theoretically and empirically. In hence, we will spend about half of the semester to look into this new international law methodological trend in this seminar, in addition to some of the conventional international law subjects.
In consistent with the course interests, this seminar is organized in two parts. The first part of the course provides a general theoretical/ methodological introduction to international law. In response to the aforementioned new demand for re-understanding the international law, this part will put emphasis on cultivating each participant’s ability of asking, answering, and interpreting the role of international law, as understood from various methodological and theoretical perspectives. In specific, policy-oriented, rational-choice, transnational legal process, feminists and the third world approaches to international law will be explored. The second part of the course offers three selected specialized areas of international law: economic law, human rights law and the laws of war.
In consistent with the course interests, this seminar is organized in two parts. The first part of the course provides a general theoretical/ methodological introduction to international law. In response to the aforementioned new demand for re-understanding the international law, this part will put emphasis on cultivating each participant’s ability of asking, answering, and interpreting the role of international law, as understood from various methodological and theoretical perspectives. In specific, policy-oriented, rational-choice, transnational legal process and feminist approaches to international law will be explored. The second part of the course offers three selected specialized areas of international law: economic law, human rights law, and law of the sea.
 

課程目標
Apprehension of various public international law theories and methodologies 
課程要求
There are three requirements for you to take this class.
1. Class participation: Each of you is required to lead your fellow classmates to read and discuss reading assignments at least twice in the semester. You are also expected to participate actively in seminar discussions. It is also your responsibility to check up if I upload any course supplement on the CEIBA. Class participation will comprise 10% of the final grade.
2. Summary or reflection work: Each of you is required to submit a two-page summary or reflection work: (1) each week for the first part of the course, and (2) each selected topic for the second part of the course. In total, you are required to submit 10 summary or reflection work. You will find that writing reflection or summary work will be very helpful for you to write your final research paper. Reflection or summary work will comprise 25% of the final grade. (3) You are required to upload your summary or reflection work on the CEIBA BEFORE the class. Late submission of each week’s work will be deducted 10% of that work’s grade.
3. Final research paper: Each of you is required to write an independent research paper (about 10,000 – 15,000 words), which will comprise 65% of the final grade. Such paper should examine either theoretical/ methodological issue of international law or a combination of both theoretical/ methodological issue and any selected topic of international law. An empirical test of international law methodology/ model is also strongly encouraged. An outline of your final research paper should be uploaded on the CEIBA no later than Week 16.
4. The deadline for the final research paper: TBA.  
預期每週課後學習時數
 
Office Hours
 
指定閱讀
待補 
參考書目
待補 
評量方式
(僅供參考)
   
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題
第1週
2/17  Introduction 
第2週
2/24  【IR-IL: International Relations and International Law】1. Anne-Marie Slaughter, International Law and International Relations Theory: A Dual Agenda, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 87 (1993), pp. 205-39. 2. Robert O. Keohane, “International Relations and International Law: Two Optics,” Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 38, No. 2 (1997), pp. 487-502. 3. David Armstrong, Theo Farrell and Helene Lambert, International Law and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), Chapters 1 and 3, pp. 1-5, 69-113. 
第3週
3/03  【The Rational-choice Perspective (I)】 1. Daniel Bodansky, “International Law in Black and White,” Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 34 (2005-2006), pp. 285-304.2. Andrew T. Guzman, How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), Chapters 1-2, pp. 1-69 
第4週
3/10  【The Rational-choice Perspective (II)】
1. Andrew T. Guzman, How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), Chapters 3-4, pp. 71-181.
2. Robert O. Keohane, “Rational Choice Theory and International law: Insights and
Limitations.” Journal of Legal Studies 31(January 2002), pp. 307-31.
 
第5週
3/17  【New Haven School (I): Policy-oriented Perspective】
1. W. Michael Reisman, Seigfried Wiessner, and Andrew W. Willard, “The New Haven School: A Brief Introduction,” Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 32 (2007), pp. 575-582.
2. Myres S. McDougal, Harold D. Lasswell and W. Michael Reisman, "The World Constitutive Process of Authoritative Decision," in International Law Essays: A Supplement to International Law in Contemporary Perspective 191 (Myres S. McDougal and W. Michael Reisman ,eds.,1981).
 
第6週
3/24  【New Haven School(II): Transnational Legal Process Perspective】
1. Harold Hongju Koh, "Transnational Legal Process," 75 Nebraska Law Review 181, 181-207 (1996).
2. Janet Levit, Bottom-Up Lawmaking Through a Pluralist Lens: The ICC Banking Commission and the Transnational Regulation of Letters of Credit, 57 Emory L. J. 1147-1185 (2008).
 
第7週
3/31  【Feminists and TWAIL Approaches to International Law】
1. Hilary Charlesworth, Christine Chinkin & Shelley Wright, Feminist Approaches to International Law, 85 American Journal of International Law 613-645 (1991).
2. Hilary Charlesworth & Christine Chinkin, Gender of Jus Cogens, 15 Human Rights Quarterly 63-76 (1993).
3. Makau Mutua, “What Is TWAIL [Third World Approaches to International Law]?” 94 Proc. Am. Soc. Int’l. L. Vol. 31 (2000), pp. 31-38.  
第8週
4/07  Conference leave or Guest Speaker 
第9週
4/14  【Sources of International Law】
1. Edward T. Swainet, Reserving, 31 Yale Journal of International Law 307-366 (2006).
2. Andrew T. Guzman, How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), Chapter 5, “Customary International Law,” pp. 183-210.
 
第10週
4/21  【Bilateral Investment (I)】
1. Jeswald W. Salacuse & Nicholas P. Sullivan, “Do BITs Really Work?: An Evaluation of BITs & Their Grand Bargain”, 46 Harvard International Law Journal 67 (2005).
2. Jeswald W. Salacuse, “The Emerging Global Regime for Investment”, 51 Harvard
International Law Journal 427-473 (2010).
 
第11週
4/28  【Bilateral Investment (II)】
1. Andrew Guzman, “Why LDCs Sign Treaties that Hurt Them: Explaining the Popularity of Bilateral Investment Treaties,” Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 38 (1998), pp. 639-88.
2. Elkins, Zachary, Andrew T Guzman, and Beth A Simmons. 2006. "Competing for
Capital: The Diffusion of Bilateral Investment Treaties, 1960-2000." 60(4) International Organization: pp. 811-846.
 
第12週
5/05  【Bilateral Investment (III)】
1. Anthea Roberts, “Power and Persuasion in Investment Treaty Interpretation: The Dual Role of States”, 104 Am. J. Int'l L. 179-225 (2010).
2. David R. Sedlak, ICSID’s Resurgence in International Investment Arbitration: Can the Momentum Hold?, 23 Penn State International Law Review 147 (2004).
 
第13週
5/12  【Human Rights (I) 】
1. Hersch Lauterpacht, "The Universal Declaration of Human Rights" 25 British Year Book of International Law 354 (1948).
2. Jochen Von Bernstorff, "The Changing Fortunes of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Genesis and Symbolic Dimensions of the Turn to Rights in International Law," 19(5) European Journal of International Law 903 (2008).
3. His Holiness Benedict XVI Joseph Ratzinger, "Address to the United Nations General Assembly of 18 April 2008," 19(5) European Journal of International Law 920-927 (2008).
4. Mary Anne Glendon, "Justice and Human Rights: Reflections on the Address of Pope Benedict to the UN," 19(5) European Journal of International Law 925 (2008).
 
第14週
5/19  【Human Rights (II)】
1. Ryan Goodman and Derek Jinks, “How to Influence States: Socialization and International Human Rights Law, 54 Duke Law Journal 621-703 (2004-2005).
 
第15週
5/26  【Human Rights (III)】
1. Oona A. Hathaway, “Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference?” Yale Law Journal, Vol. 111 (2001-2002), pp. 1935-2042.
2. Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. (2005). “Trading Human Rights: How Preferential Trade Agreements Influence Government Repression,” International Organization, Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 593-629.
3. Mowbray, Alistair. 2005. "The Creativity of the European Court of Human Rights." Human Rights Law Review 5(1): 57-79.
 
第16週
6/02  【Law of the Sea (I)】
1. Tomas H. Heidar, “Legal Aspects of Continental Shelf Limits” in LEGAL
AND SCIENTIFIC ASPECTS OF CONTINENTAL SHELF LIMITS, (Eds. M.
Nordquist et al., Martinus Nijhoff, 2004), pp. 19-39.
2. Bing Bing Jia, The Notion of Natural Prolongation in the Current Regime of the Continental Shelf: An Afterlife?, 12 Chinese Journal of International Law (2013).
 
第17週
6/09  【Law of the Sea (II)】
1. Peter Dutton, Caelum Liberam: Air Defense Identification Zone Outside Sovereign Airspace, 103 American Journal of International Law 1(2009).
2. J. Ashley Roach, “Defining Scientific Research: Marine Data Collection” in LAW,
SCIENCE AND OCEAN MANAGEMENT, (Eds. M. Nordquist et al., Martinus
Nijhoff, 2007).
 
第18週
6/16  【Law of the Sea (III)】
Agora:The South China Sea, 106 American Journal of International Law 98-141 (2012), including:
1. Zhiguo Gao and Bing Bing Jia, “The Nine-Dash Line in the South China Sea: History, Status, and Implications”.
2. Florian Dupuy and Pierre-Marie Dupuy, “A Legal Analysis of China’s Historic Rights Claim in the South China Sea”.